Editing
Final Report 2010
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Discussion==== As can be seen, the results collected are not identical to the previous student’s results; however they are very different to the graph depicting the code from the Somerton man. It is clear that in both sets of results there is not 1 singular letter that has a frequency less than 1%. This leads us to agree with the previous assumption that the code has not been produced randomly in a sober attempt to deceive or create a diversion. A very similar result was obtained with the intoxicated samples. This suggests that it is also unlikely that the mystery code has been written in a random fashion by an intoxicated or delusional individual. The fact that the two different results (this year and last year) show varying results is important. This suggests that the amount of samples collected each time is most likely not enough to give a perfect answer as to whether or not the code has been produced randomly by an individual. Future studies could work on taking a much larger number of samples to see whether the letter distribution varies greatly from those already collected and therefore also obtain a more definitive conclusion. Another important detail is the small number of letters in the mystery code itself (about 45). If a given letter of the alphabet is only expected to occur, say 1% of the time when produced randomly by a person, then it is highly likely that it would not occur at all in a sample of only 45 letters. If it has been produced randomly this could explain why some letters, such as X, Y, and J are not present in the mystery code at all. However, the high frequency of the letters K and Z in the collected samples suggest that this is not the case. In summary, from the results obtained, it is feasible to assume that the mystery code has not been produced randomly by somebody in a state of intoxication or as a form of deception however this could be further established with a larger sample base. [[Image:Random_letter_samples_pic.jpg|center]] Below are the results obtained by the 2009 students. [[Image:compare.png|center]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Derek may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Derek:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information