Editing
Small World Networks 2008
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Critical Design Review == For the Critical Design Review (not due until Week 8) you need to have the following parts: * Project Aim & Background * Literature review, where you discuss a number (say 10-15) of papers / books and their contributions. Try and summarise in a few sentences what each one is about. * Your approach - what you are going to do, your software design (see below), and who is going to do what. * Analysis of your software design - what are the hard sections, what are the critical parts that you need to get working first. * Project management stuff. For risks you don't need to worry much about Occupational Health & Safety (apart from general computer set up) but there are other risks in your project to do with task timing, what happens if someone (including Derek and I) is unavailable, budget over-runs (should be minimal risk but you can still mention it). Aside from the engineering applications (where small-world networks are important), the other engineering in this project is software engineering. You should have a block diagram showing the main parts of the software, i.e. graph file format converter, graph drawer, network measure calculators, hierarchy algorithm, and matlab analysis (graphing and statistics), and my software for converting the email data set into a graph file. For some of these you can then include what sub-modules they have, e.g. the network measure calculator might have sub-modules for degree distribution, for clustering coefficient. You should also have a flow diagram showing the data flow between these modules, and in the critical design review give details of the algorithms. You can software you find on the web but you will need to acknowledge it in your proposal report, make sure you understand how it works, and test it. It may be easier though, to write the software yourself then writing a file format converter to get other software to work. The Critical Design Review can just be emailed directly to myself and Derek on the due date, and you only need one for your group. For the final report you need to write one each (please don't copy each other's writing but write it in your words - you can copy equations, flow charts, graphs, diagrams, reference list, software though. Derek and I are happy to read draft copies.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Derek may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Derek:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information