Difference between revisions of "Final Report/Thesis 2015"

Revision as of 13:04, 15 October 2015 (view source) A1628026 (Talk | contribs) (→‎Work Breakdown/Deliverables) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:17, 15 October 2015 (view source) A1628026 (Talk | contribs) (→‎Work Breakdown/Deliverables) Newer edit →
Line 68:		Line 68:
	===Work Breakdown/Deliverables===		===Work Breakdown/Deliverables===
		+	The workload for this project was broken down into its main tasks. These can be seen in list form in the Final Project Gantt Chart (see Timeline section). The key deliverables are represented as milestones on the Gantt Chart. The dependencies of the tasks and deliverables can be seen in the Gantt Chart as black arrows, these are as follows: The Research Proposal and Progress Report have dependence on the Draft Research Proposal, which has dependence on the Proposal Seminar. Of the specific project tasks, Task 1 was completed first, and Tasks 2, 3 and 4 were completed in parallel. The Final Seminar Presentation, Project Exhibition Poster, Final Performance, Youtube video and Dump of final work are all dependent on the completion of the specific project tasks. The Final Report/Honours Thesis was completed in parallel with the rest of the work from the Research Proposal and Progress Report hand-up, onwards.
	===Timeline===		===Timeline===

---

Revision as of 13:17, 15 October 2015

Executive Summary

Introduction

Motivation

Previous Studies/Related Work

Aims and Objectives

Significance

Technical Background

P-Value Theorem Explanation

Chi-Squared Test Explanation

Universal Declaration of Human Rights Explanation

Project Gutenberg Explanation

N-Gram Model Explanation

One-Time Pad Explanation

Knowledge Gaps and Technical Challenges

Method - Specific Tasks

Task 1: Statistical Frequency Analysis of Letters

Aim

Method

Results

Evaluation and Justification

Task 2: N-Gram Search

Aim

Method

Results

Evaluation and Justification

Task 3: Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam as a One-Time Pad

Aim

Method

Results

Evaluation and Justification

Task 4: Statistical Frequency of Letters Reanalysis

Aim

Method

Results

Evaluation and Justification

Project Management - Planning and Feasibility

Work Breakdown/Deliverables

The workload for this project was broken down into its main tasks. These can be seen in list form in the Final Project Gantt Chart (see Timeline section). The key deliverables are represented as milestones on the Gantt Chart. The dependencies of the tasks and deliverables can be seen in the Gantt Chart as black arrows, these are as follows: The Research Proposal and Progress Report have dependence on the Draft Research Proposal, which has dependence on the Proposal Seminar. Of the specific project tasks, Task 1 was completed first, and Tasks 2, 3 and 4 were completed in parallel. The Final Seminar Presentation, Project Exhibition Poster, Final Performance, Youtube video and Dump of final work are all dependent on the completion of the specific project tasks. The Final Report/Honours Thesis was completed in parallel with the rest of the work from the Research Proposal and Progress Report hand-up, onwards.

Timeline

The timeline for this project was created in the form of a Gantt Chart. The proposed Gantt Chart can be seen in Figure X.

The final Gantt Chart after all revisions and updates can be seen in Figure X.

Changes made from the originally proposed Gantt Chart to the final revised Gantt Chart include the renaming of Tasks 2 and 4 to N-Gram Search and Statistical Frequency of Letters Reanalysis. Task 2 was completed earlier than expected, but cleaning up results for presentation and finding meaningful combinations of the results proved to take longer than expected, and so the second part of Task 2 was extended. Task 3 was also extended so that Jikai was able to complete this task. Task 4 was commenced earlier than proposed since the bulk of Task 2 was completed early. The dump of final work and project youtube video were moved to be completed after the due date of the Final Report/Thesis upon discussion with our supervisors. Overall, our initially proposed Gantt Chart estimated our project timeline quite accurately and only minor changes needed to be made.

Task Allocation

Management Strategy

Budget

Risk Analysis

Conclusions

Future Work

References

Glossary and Symbols

• ASIO: Australian Security Intelligence Organisation
• ASIS: Australian Secret Intelligence Service
• ASD: Australian Signals Directorate
• P-value theorem: The p-value is the calculated probability that gives researchers a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis ^[1].
• Chi-Squared Test:
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
• Project Gutenberg:
• N-gram model: The N-gram model is a sequence of n items from a given sequence of phonemes, syllables, letters, words or base pairs ^[2].
• One-time pad: The one-time pad is a decoder technology which cannot be cracked if the correct key is used ^[3].
• Initialism: A group of letters formed using the initial letters of a group of words or a phrase ^[4].
• Ciphertext: The encoded format of a message ^[5].
• Plaintext: The information of an original message, which is desired to be deciphered from the ciphertext </ref>.

http://www.maths.uq.edu.au/~pa/SCIE1000/gma.pdf</ref>.

• Key: What is needed to convert the ciphertext into the plaintext using the one-time pad </ref>.

Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found